# Normalized supplier decision matrix

Version: 2026.08.31-applied-1

Use: Compare scope and risk on the same basis. Example figures are fictional and exclude any inference that the suppliers exist.

Important: The MesaLift entries are fictional examples, not client results or product specifications. Replace them with evidence from your own controlled work. This planning tool is not legal, financial, engineering, compliance, safety, or investment advice.

## Instructions

1. Issue one controlled RFQ revision and log every clarification.
2. Enter unknown rather than zero when a supplier omits a cost or term.
3. Keep quoted facts separate from verification evidence and the team’s risk judgment.

## Editable table

| supplier_code | rfq_revision | unit_price | material_exclusions | tooling_terms | landed_cost_scenario | sample_status | verification_limit | decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NORTH | R3 | $1,980 fictional | inspection; packaging; actuator warranty | standard tools included | $2,470 adverse | sample authorized | documents not independently confirmed | clarify and sample |
| MESA | R3 | $2,257 fictional | freight | no dedicated tooling stated | $2,510 adverse | sample authorized | capacity evidence pending | clarify and sample |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

## Decision note

Decision: [pass / rework / stop]

Decision owner:

Evidence reviewed:

Limitations and unresolved risks:

Authorized next action, budget, and date: